Where Do We Go from here? Post-pandemic Planning and the Future of Graduate Medical Education.

Background: As the pandemic wanes, there is an opportunity to reevaluate resultant changes in graduate medical education (GME), particularly from the viewpoints of those affected most. We aimed to assess both trainee and faculty perceptions on the educational changes and innovations resulting from the pandemic to inform future educational planning. Methods: We surveyed trainees and core education faculty at three New York City children's hospitals. Surveys assessed perceived changes to educational activities, skills, scholarship, effectiveness of virtual teaching, future desirability, and qualitative themes. Results: The survey was completed by 194 participants, including 88 (45.4%) faculty and 106 (54.6%) trainees. Trainees were more likely to report a negative impact of the pandemic compared with faculty (75.5% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). Most respondents reported a decrease in formal educational activities (69.8%), inpatient (77.7%) and outpatient (77.8%) clinical teaching. Despite this, most perceived clinical and teaching skills to have stayed the same. Most (93.4%) participated in virtual education; however, only 36.5% of faculty taught virtually. Only 4.2% of faculty had extensive training in virtual teaching and 28.9% felt very comfortable teaching virtually. In the future, most (87.5%) prefer a hybrid approach, particularly virtual didactic conferences and virtual grand rounds. Faculty themes included challenges to workflows and increased empathy for trainees, while trainee themes included increased work/life balance and support, but increased burnout. Conclusion: Many changes and innovations resulted from the pandemic. Hospital systems and GME programs should consider this data and incorporate viewpoints from trainees and faculty when adapting educational strategies in the future. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01737-8.

Decreasing the Newborn Birth Hospitalization Length of Stay.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine our ability to shorten birth hospitalization length of stay (LOS) in which patient characteristics were associated with early discharge and had effects on early newborn readmission rate. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of births from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, was considered for this study. Delivery mode and maternal and newborn characteristics were evaluated for effect on discharge timing. Hospital readmissions within 7 days of discharge were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 845 out of 1,077 total live births were included in the study population. Five hundred and eighty-nine (69.7%) newborns were discharged early (<48 hours after vaginal delivery [VD] and <72 hours after cesarean delivery [CS]). Factors associated with early discharge included 79.8% CS (p < 0.001), 84% birth after 2 p.m. (p < 0.001), 71.2% no diagnosis of maternal diabetes (p = 0.02), and 70.6% negative maternal coronavirus disease 2019 (p = 0.01). The overall 7-day readmission rate was 1.2 and 0.5% for newborns discharged early after VD. CONCLUSION: Most newborns can be discharged early without increasing newborn readmission. KEY POINTS: · Most patients were discharged <72 hours after CS.. · Most patients were discharged <48 hours after VD.. · Early discharge does not affect newborn readmissions..

Children and Adolescents with Disabilities and Exposure to Disasters, Terrorism, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Scoping Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews the empirical literature on exposures to disaster or terrorism and their impacts on the health and well-being of children with disabilities and their families since the last published update in 2017. We also review the literature on studies examining the mental health and functioning of children with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Few studies have examined the effects of disaster or terrorism on children with disabilities. Research shows that children with disabilities and their families have higher levels of disaster exposure, lower levels of disaster preparedness, and less recovery support due to longstanding discriminatory practices. Similarly, many reports of the COVID-19 pandemic have documented its negative and disproportionate impacts on children with disabilities and their families. In the setting of climate change, environmental disasters are expected to increase in frequency and severity. Future studies identifying mitigating factors to disasters, including COVID-19; increasing preparedness on an individual, community, and global level; and evaluating post-disaster trauma-informed treatment practices are imperative to support the health and well-being of children with disabilities and their families.

Children and young adults hospitalized for severe COVID-19 exhibit thrombotic coagulopathy.

We report the clinical and laboratory coagulation characteristics of 27 pediatric and young adult patients (2 months to 21 years) treated for symptomatic COVID-19 at a children's hospital in the Bronx, New York, between March 1 and May 31, 2020. D-Dimer was > 0.5 µg/mL (upper limit of normal) in 25 (93%) patients at admission; 11 (41%) developed peak D-dimer > 5 µg/mL during admission. Seven (26%) patients developed venous thromboembolism: three with deep vein thrombosis and four with pulmonary embolism. Requirement of increased ventilatory support was a risk factor for thrombosis (P = 0.006). Three of eight (38%) patients on prophylactic anticoagulation developed thrombosis; however, no patients developed VTE on low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis titrated to anti-Xa level. Manifestation of COVID-19 disease was severe or critical in 16 (59%) patients. Four (15%) patients died of COVID-19 complications: all had comorbidities. Elevated D-dimer and increased VTE rate were observed in this young cohort, particularly in those with severe respiratory complications, suggesting thrombotic coagulopathy. More data are needed to guide thromboprophylaxis in this age group.

Acute chest syndrome in the setting of SARS-COV-2 infections-A case series at an urban medical center in the Bronx.

New York City has emerged as one of the epicenters of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, with the Bronx being disproportionately affected. This novel coronavirus has caused significant respiratory manifestations raising the concern for development of acute chest syndrome (ACS) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). We report a series of pediatric SCD SARS-COV-2-positive patients admitted with ACS. SARS-COV-2-positive SCD patients, who did not develop ACS, were the comparison group. Hydroxyurea use (P-value = .02) and lower absolute monocyte counts (P-value = .04) were noted in patients who did not develop ACS. These preliminary findings need to be further evaluated in larger cohorts.